(PS) Murphy v. AIG Claims, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20202:20-cv-00301California1,462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON O. MURPHY ESQ. SR., DBA No. 2:20-cv-00301-TLN-AC PS

SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

AIG CLAIMS, INC.,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). A. Screening Standard The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.