Borum

(PC) Shepard v. Borum

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20201:18-cv-00277California1,093 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMONT SHEPARD, Case No. 1:18-cv-00277-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE

GRANTED

M. BORUM, et al., ECF No. 29 Defendants. 10-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges retaliation in violation of his First Amendment rights, claiming that he was punished for submitting grievances and filing lawsuits. Defendants are employees of Kern Valley State Prison, where plaintiff was imprisoned at the time of the alleged incidents. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 29. We order defendants to show cause why the court should not grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the merits. Plaintiff has met his initial burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact and that judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.