(PC) Gonzales v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20201:19-cv-00459California737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL GONZALES, Case No. 1:19-cv-00459-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION

v. REGARDING DEFENDANTS GONZALES

AND CENA IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE

GONZALES, et al., SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND

COMPLAINT

Defendants. (ECF No. 24)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Michael Gonzales is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2019, the Court found that service of Plaintiff’s complaint was appropriate as to Defendants Godinez, Cena, Gonzales, Harry, Villegas, Serato (or Serrato), Gonzalez, Shoemaker, Perez, Willis, Arron, Torres, and Harmon for providing Plaintiff with food tainted with involuntary antipsychotic medication without a Keyhea order in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 13.) On January 2, 2020, pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.