Valinken

(HC) Lin v. Valinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20201:19-cv-01806California836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WEI LIN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01806-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

v. FILE RESPONSE TO PETITION

RICHARD VALINKEN, et al., (ECF No. 12) Respondents.

16 Petitioner Wei Lin is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner alleges violations of his right to due process in connection with his expedited removal proceedings and credible fear determination. (ECF No. 1). Petitioner also moves for a stay of removal. (ECF No. 4). The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 11, 13). The Court conducted a preliminary review of the petition and determined that it was not clear from the face of the petition whether Petitioner is entitled to relief. On January 8, 2020, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response to both the petition and Petitioner’s motion for stay of removal within sixty days. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.