Rose
(PC) Anderson v. Rose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TUANJA EDWARD ANDERSON, No. 2:18-cv-1216 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. ROSE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On October 4, 2019, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status was revoked. On December 18, 2019, this case was dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to pay the court’s filing fee in full. Plaintiff seeks an order notifying the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) that plaintiff should not be charged for the court’s partial filing fees and reimbursing the $5.00 plaintiff has already paid. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request is granted. The order requiring the CDCR to withdraw funds toward plaintiff’s filing fee is vacated, and the Financial Department is directed to refund plaintiff the sum of $5.00. See Jameson v. Rawers, 2009 WL 981390, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2009) (where prisoner’s in forma pauperis status is revoked, partial filing fee…