(PS) Ferrantino v. Sacramento County Office of Education

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20202:18-cv-03063California3,129 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY FERRANTINO, No. 2:18-cv-3063 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF

EDUCATION,

15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Anthony Ferrantino is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) or in the alternative for a more definitive statement pursuant to 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and plaintiff’s motions to transfer venue. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is granted, plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint, and the motions to transfer are denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on November 27, 2018, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.