Doyle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 THOMAS DOYLE, Case No. 1:19-cv-01435-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED NOAH MARSHAL, et al., FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER

Defendants. (Doc. 4)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

15 On October 11, 2019, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case against Defendants. (Doc. 16 1.) Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 3.) On November 21, 2019, 17 the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to file either a first amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983, a habeas corpus petition, or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days of the date of 19 service of the order. (Doc. 4.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with the November 21, 2019 20 order.1 21 The Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 22 corresponding with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel 23…