Spearman

(HC) Franks v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20201:18-cv-00385California724 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOM MARK FRANKS, No. 1:18-cv-00385-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

M.E. SPEARMAN, THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

Respondent. (Doc. No. 21)

17 Petitioner Tom Mark Franks is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 17, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the pending petition for federal habeas relief be denied and that the court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. (Doc. No. 21.) Specifically, the findings and recommendations analyzed, and rejected on the merits, petitioner’s claims that he received ineffective assistance by his trial counsel. Those findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.