(PS)Selck
(PS)Selck v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:19-cv-952-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS, TOMOKO
WILLIAMS, Defendants. 16 17 Several motions are pending in this action, which are addressed herein1: 18 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s original complaint for lack of subject matter 19 jurisdiction and failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement 21 pursuant to Rule 12(e) (ECF No. 7); 22 2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 9 & 18); 23 3. Plaintiff’s motions to amend the complaint2; and
This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).