Weiss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LAKE, No. 2:19-cv-2083 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On February 20, 2020, plaintiff re-filed a portion of his prior motion for temporary restraining order, marking it “Refiled NonResponsive.” (ECF No. 16.) Included with his motion was a document addressed to four different courts, referencing his motion for injunctive relief, but bearing the title “Amended Petition for Relief of Retaliation. . . ., and plaintiff’s note “Non-Responsive Refiled.” (ECF No. 16 at 7.) As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion should be denied without prejudice, and the undersigned declines to construe the attachment as plaintiff’s amended complaint. II. Motion for Injunctive Relief Plaintiff continues to complain that he is deprived of his property. Plaintiff seeks recovery…