(SS) Medina Venegas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20201:19-cv-00079California5,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

19 Plaintiff Antonio Medina Venegas (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of the final decision 20 of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his 21 application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act. The 22 matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs which were submitted without oral 23 argument to the Honorable Gary S. Austin, United States Magistrate Judge. See Docs. 15, 16 24 and 17. Having reviewed the record as a whole, the Court finds that the ALJ’s decision is 25 supported by substantial evidence and applicable law. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s appeal is denied. 26 ///

1 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. See Docs. 7 and 8. II. Procedural Background On May 4, 2015, Plaintiff filed an application for disability insurance benefits alleging disability beginning January 4, 2014. AR 28. The Commissioner denied the application initially on November 19, 2015, and again following reconsideration on February 19, 2016. AR 28. On February 24, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.