(SS)Binford

(SS)Binford v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20202:18-cv-03272California4,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENISE BINFORD, No. 2:18-cv-03272-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (ECF Nos. 14, 15) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. In her summary judgment motion, Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in discounting Plaintiff’s subjective symptom testimony and the opinion of her treating physician. The Commissioner opposed and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiff’s motion, and AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s decision. /// ///

1 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15), and the parties consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned for all purposes. (See ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.