Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assoc. v. CA Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:18-cv-01584California4,961 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS No. 2:18-cv-01584-MCE-KJN

ASSOCIATION, JONATHAN COUPAL,

and DEBRA DESROSIERS, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. THE CALIFORNIA SECURE CHOICE

RETIREMENT SAVINGS PROGRAM

and JOHN CHIANG, in his official capacity as Chair of the CALIFORNIA SECURE CHOICES RETIREMENT

SAVINGS INVESTMENT BOARD,

18 Defendants. 19 The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (“HJTA”) and individually named HJTA employees Jonathan Coupal and Debra Desrosiers (“HJTA Employees”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action against the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program (“CalSavers” or “the Program”) and California State Treasurer John Chiang (collectively, “Defendants”) contending that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA” or “the Act”) preempts the Program. Plaintiffs’ Complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Mem. and Order, ECF No. 24 (“Prior Order”). They subsequently filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.