Arellano

Arellano v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20201:17-cv-01235California2,323 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIK ARELLANO, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01235 - LJO-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE ) AS MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND v. ) DISQUALIFICATION (Doc. 51) ) CHAD HASKINS, et al., ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ) DISQUALIFICATION Defendants. ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE THE ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT )

Erik Arellano asserts Bakersfield Police Officers Chad Haskins and Frederick Martinez used excessive force after he surrendered to their arrest. (Doc. 9) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, after which the Court issued a Rand notice and directed Plaintiff to file an opposition to the motion no later than February 14, 2020. Plaintiff filed a response to the Rand notice on March 5, 2020. (Doc. 51) Plaintiff reports that he received the document following the deadline…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.