Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. JAG Trucking, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20201:18-cv-01046California302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEONEL GONZALEZ and JONATHAN Case No. 1:18-cv-01046 LJO JLT

BASULTO,

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE AS TO Plaintiffs, CERTAIN ACTIONS AND DEFENDANTS 13 (Doc. 119) vs. 14 JAG TRUCKING, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. ____________________________________

AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS

18 In January, the parties who have appeared in these actions, were able settle them. (Doc. 117) They have now filed a document seeking to have the action dismissed with prejudice and with all parties bearing their own fees and costs. Id. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED: 1. To close the action Leonel Gonzalez, Jonathan Basulto v. Jag Trucking Inc and Joshua Nicholson in its entirety; 2. To close the cross-action, Andrew Lee Lerma v. Jag Trucking Inc and Joshua Nicholson in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.