Tafoya
Tafoya v. City of Hanford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER TAFOYA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00010-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT
CITY OF HANFORD, et al., (ECF No. 6)
Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christopher Tafoya (“Plaintiff” or “Tafoya”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed this action on January 3, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On January 21, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found it failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 4.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of service of the screening order. (ECF No. 4.) Currently before the Court for screening is 26 …