Strojnik

Strojnik v. Hi Fresno Hotel Holdings, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20201:19-cv-01195California478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER STROJNIK, SR., Case No. 1:19-cv-01195-NONE-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO APPEAR

AND FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT

HI FRESNO HOTEL HOLDINGS, LLC, ORDER Defendant. (Doc. No. 14)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

13 On February 4, 2020, the Court convened an initial scheduling conference. (Doc. No. 14.) The parties informed the Court that they had reached a resolution of the action but required additional time to draft and finalize a settlement agreement. (Id.) Accordingly, the Court set a Telephonic Status Conference for March 9, 2020, at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before the undersigned to address the status of settlement. (Id.) The Court further informed the parties that if they filed appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude the action in its entirety before the conference, then the conference would be vacated. (Id.) On March 5, 2020, Plaintiff Peter 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.