Baker
(PC) Houston v. Baker
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HOUSTON, No. 2:18-cv-1271-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL
SETTLEMENT STATEMENTS FOR
BAKER, PRISONER SETTLEMENT PROGRAM AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
Defendant. “MANDATORY PHONE ACCESS” 16 The parties to this action shall each, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements shall not be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead, delivered by mail, fax, email or personal delivery to the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at the address, fax number or email address below and marked “Confidential.” Such statements shall be limited to five (5) pages and shall include the following: 1. The party’s assessment of whether the instant action is of the type that would benefit from a settlement proceeding; …