Baker

(PC) Houston v. Baker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20202:18-cv-01271California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HOUSTON, No. 2:18-cv-1271-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL

SETTLEMENT STATEMENTS FOR

BAKER, PRISONER SETTLEMENT PROGRAM AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

Defendant. “MANDATORY PHONE ACCESS” 16 The parties to this action shall each, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements shall not be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead, delivered by mail, fax, email or personal delivery to the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at the address, fax number or email address below and marked “Confidential.” Such statements shall be limited to five (5) pages and shall include the following: 1. The party’s assessment of whether the instant action is of the type that would benefit from a settlement proceeding; …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.