Justice
Justice v. Fidelis Recovery Management, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY D. JUSTICE, No. 2:18-CV-3107-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER FIDELIS RECOVERY MANAGEMENT,
LLC,
15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. See ECF No. 1. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s unopposed motion for default judgment. See ECF No. 9. Where a defendant has failed to respond to the complaint, the Court presumes that all well-pleaded factual allegations relating to liability are true. See Geddes v. United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977) (per curiam); Danning v. Lavine, 572 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1978); Televideo Systems, Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 917-18 (9th Cir. 1987) (per curiam); see also Discovery Communications, Inc. v. Animal Planet, Inc., 172 F. Supp. 2d 1282, 27 …