Dwivedi

(PC) Brookins v. Dwivedi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20201:18-cv-00645California1,294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY L. BROOKINS, 1:18-cv-00645-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO SET ASIDE

vs. ENTRY OF DEFAULT (ECF No. 39.) RAJENDRA DWIVEDI,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendant. MOTIONS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST

DEFENDANT DWIVEDI (ECF Nos. 36, 45.)

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS

MOOT

20 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Barry L. Brookins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on May 10, 2019, against sole defendant Dr. Rajendra Dwivedi (“Defendant”) for failing to provide adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) On January 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for entry of default against defendant Dwivedi, and on February…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.