Matevousion
(PC) Dial v. Matevousion
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNDELLE DIAL, No. 1:18-cv-00679-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
ANDRE MATEVOUSION, et al., (Doc. No. 32) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Shaundelle Dial is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 3, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending dismissal of this case due to plaintiff’s failures to prosecute and comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 25.) On January 14, 2020, the court adopted those findings and recommendations and dismissed the action. (Doc. No. 30.) Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration of judgment and for the appointment of a lawyer. (Doc. No.…