Kevin H. Scott v. Jayco, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20201:19-cv-00315California4,497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN H. SCOTT, et al., ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00315 - JLT ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER ) ESTABLISHING THE CONTROLLING LAW v. ) ) (Doc. 49) JAYCO INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) (

Kevin and Jacqie Scott, residents of California, purchased a new RV in the state of Iowa. Following the purchase, the plaintiffs discovered the RV suffered from various defects and sought repairs covered by the warranty from the manufacturer, Jayco, Inc. Plaintiffs seek to hold Jacyco liable under both state and federal law, including California’s Unfair Competition Act, California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. The parties disagree whether Iowa or California remedies apply under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Plaintiffs seek an order from the Court to establish the remedy applicable to this cause of action. (Doc. 49) For the reasons set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.