Hartwick

(PC) Perkins v. Hartwick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:18-cv-03156California1,820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LONNIE DONNELL PERKINS, No. 2:18-cv-3156-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IFP AND SCREENING

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

F. HARTWICK, et al., § 1915A Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 2). Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.