(PC) Bowell v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:17-cv-00981California577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES BOWELL, No. 2:17-cv-0981 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s claims that defendants Lewis and Allison, both employed in Sacramento, violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights based on forced TB skin tests. (See ECF No. 17 at 2.) While plaintiff’s February 24, 2020 motion was pending, plaintiff filed a second motion for court order on March 5, 2020. His latest motion is styled, “Imminent Danger Exist [sic] Irreparable Harm.” (ECF No. 73.) Plaintiff again recounts various medical doctors’ alleged medical malpractice while plaintiff is incarcerated at RJ Donovan State Prison (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, but now appears to claim that comprehensive deprivation of medical care may demonstrate deliberate indifference. It is unclear what…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.