Castrillo

(PC) Brown v. Castrillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:19-cv-00248California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNIE CHEROKEE BROWN, No. 2:19-cv-0248 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E.F. CASTRILLO, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion asking that the court reconsider its February 6, 2020 order dismissing this case. A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Id. at 1263. Plaintiff does not present newly discovered evidence suggesting this matter should not have been dismissed and there has not been a change in the law. Furthermore, the court finds that, after a de novo review of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.