Catalli

(PC) Howland v. Catalli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:19-cv-00608California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICKOLAS J. HOWLAND, No. 2:19-cv-0608 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS CATALLI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 10, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 17.) After plaintiff failed to file a response, he was given an additional twenty-one days to respond to the motion and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 19.) Twenty-one days have now passed without any response from plaintiff. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.