Schmidt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME SCHMIDT, et al., No. 2:14-cv-02471-MCE-DMC Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SHASTA COUNTY MARSHAL’S OFFICE and JOEL DEAN, 15 Defendants. 16 In this action, four former employees of Defendant Shasta County Marshal’s Office (“Defendant” or the “County”) brought several claims against the County based on alleged sexual discrimination they suffered while working there. On February 21, 2017, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 48, based mainly on the Plaintiffs’ failure to demonstrate that the harassment they received was because of gender. Subsequently, the Court granted in part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 51, after which Plaintiff Jaime Schmidt’s (“Plaintiff”) retaliation claims against the County under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”) and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) were permitted to proceed. Trial resulted in a…