(PC) Murphy v. Nelson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:19-cv-01665California362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARLEEN MURPHY, No. 2:19-cv-1665 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID NELSON, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated December 23, 2019, plaintiff was ordered to submit a properly completed in forma pauperis application within thirty days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not submitted a completed in forma pauperis application, requested an extension of time to do so, updated her address, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Therefore, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.