Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERY A. TAYLOR, No. 2:19-cv-2227 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 30, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action because it contains unexhausted claims. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). Petitioner has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” Id. Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: …