Arreola
Arreola v. County of Fresno Public Defender's Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 HARONERE WILTRON ARREOLA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00272-AWI-SAB 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 COUNTY OF FRESNO PUBLIC (ECF No. 1) DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al.,
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
17 Haronere Wiltron Arreola (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court for screening is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed February 24, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir.…