(PS) Drake v. Niello Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20202:17-cv-01036California2,919 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E. DRAKE, No. 2:17-cv-1036-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

THE NIELLO COMPANY, NIELLO

IMPORTS OF ROCKLIN, INC., NIELLO

PERFORMANCE MOTORS INC.,

NIELLO MOTOR CAR COMPANY AND

SHIPPING EXPERTS INC., Defendants. 18 Defendant Niello Performance Motors, Inc.’s moved to (1) enjoin plaintiff from relitigating against Niello and its affiliates the issues adjudicated in this action, and (2) declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant and impose pre-filing restrictions. ECF No. 120. Also pending is the court’s November 28, 2018 order directing plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely respond to Niello Performance Motors’s motion. ECF No. 138. 24 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 25 undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 26 After the hearing on Niello’s motion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.