Haskins

(PC) Webster v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20201:18-cv-01640California391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS WEBSTER, Case No. 1:18-cv-01640-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT

NATALIE HASKINS TO SHOW CAUSE

v. WITHIN THIRTY DAYS WHY DEFAULT

SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED

LOVE, et al., (ECF No. 30) Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

SERVE COURTESY COPY THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Thomas Webster (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained under California Welfare Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). On October 28, 2019, the Court found service of the first amended complaint appropriate as to Defendant Natalie Haskins for denial of adequate medical care in violation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.