Yule

(PC) Snowden v. Yule

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20202:17-cv-02167California562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS SNOWDEN, III, No. 2:17-cv-2167 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. YULE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending is plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s request will be denied without prejudice. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.