Harding
United States v. Harding
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:19-cv-00871-WBS-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALFRED HARDING, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 20, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 28) herein that were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On February 28, 2020, defendant Alfred Harding filed objections to the proposed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 31). In his Objections, Mr. Harding does not raise any cogent legal argument why the magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendations should not be adopted by the court, and does not specify what relief he is seeking. Nevertheless, the court has read and considered what he has stated. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.…