Preston

(PC) Hoffman v. Preston

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20201:16-cv-01617California295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELLAS HOFFMAN, Case No. 1:16-cv-01617-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, Appeal No. 20-15396 v. ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATUS ON APPEAL

TIMOTHY PRESTON, (ECF No. 62) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Marcellas Hoffman is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On June 13, 2019, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim for failure to state a cognizable claim under Bivens. (ECF No. 44.) On January 4, 2020, the Court granted Defendant Timothy Preston’s motion to dismiss without leave to amend and dismissed this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Bivens. (ECF No. 57.) Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, pursuant to the prison mailbox rule, on March 1, 2020. (ECF No. 59.) On March 12, 2020, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.