Hamlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID MICHAEL REINHARDT, No. 1:19-cv-00892-DAD-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

W. KENT HAMLIN, et al., CASE WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. (Doc. No. 30) 16 Plaintiff David Michael Reinhardt is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action, in which he alleges that judicial officers are engaged in a conspiracy to deny his constitutional rights by denying his habeas petitions. (Doc. No. 27 at 11.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In the first screening order of plaintiff’s complaint, the assigned magistrate judge was unable to discern whether plaintiff intended to file a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or a federal habeas petition. (Doc. No. 14.) Therefore, the magistrate judge provided plaintiff with the pleading requirements for both types…