(CONSENT) Kolb v. County of Placer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL KOLB, J.K., by and through his No. 2:19-cv-0079 DB Guardian ad Litem, KARIN KOLB, and KARIN KOLB, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. COUNTY OF PLACER; DEPUTY
CURTIS HONEYCUTT,
16 Defendants. 18 On February 21, 2020, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel deposition and a motion to compel production of documents from defendant Curtis Honeycutt. (ECF Nos. 48 & 49.) The motions are set for hearing before the court on March 20, 2020. On March 6, 2020, the parties’ filed a joint statement for each motion. (ECF Nos. 52 & 53.) However, on March 13, 2020, plaintiffs filed a supplemental declaration. Therein, plaintiffs state that plaintiffs received defendant Honeycutt’s response to plaintiff’s request for production of documents on March 9, 2020. (ECF No. 56 at 2.) Plaintiffs, evidently, find //// 27 1 The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 13.) defendant’s responses…