(PC) Britton v. California Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY RAY BRITTON, No. 2: 18-cv-2974 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding, without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint. (ECF No. 33.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. Background On March 22, 2019, the undersigned dismissed the original complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 17.) In this order, the undersigned discussed the merits of plaintiff’s claims. (Id.) On June 19, 2019, the undersigned dismissed the first amended complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 23.) The undersigned found that the first amended complaint did not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 because it did not identify the defendants or describe the relief sought. (Id.) On February…