Karen Gonzales v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN GONZALES, No. 19-cv-00733-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., CLOSING THIS CASE Defendant. (Doc. No. 8) 16 17 This matter is before the court on the motion to compel arbitration filed by defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”) on July 8, 2019. (Doc. No. 8.) The court deemed the motion suitable for decision without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 13.) The court has reviewed the parties’ briefing and for the reasons set forth below, will grant defendant’s motion to compel arbitration.1 BACKGROUND On May 5, 2019, plaintiff Karen Gonzales (“plaintiff”) commenced this action against Credit One, alleging that Credit One placed unauthorized calls to her cellphone apparently seeking to collect on an alleged credit card debt that she owed. (Doc. No. 1 at 3–4.) Plaintiff