Becerra

(PC) Anderson v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20201:20-cv-00068California1,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEWIS ANDERSON, No. 20-cv-00068-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, IN PART, AND

XAVIER BECERRA, et al., DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. No. 2, 4)

17 Plaintiff Lewis Anderson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2020, plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint (Doc. No. 1) and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 17, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that he be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action because: (1) he is subject to the three…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.