Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. United Revolver Club of Sacramento, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20202:18-cv-02960California340 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY No. 2:18-cv-2960 KJM DB INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania 12 corporation, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 UNITED REVOLVER CLUB OF SACRAMENTO, INC., a California 16 corporation,

17 Defendant. 18 19 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 20 302(c)(19). On February 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 23 recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any objections 24 to the findings and recommendations. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 26 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 27 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.