Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. United Revolver Club of Sacramento, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20202:18-cv-02960California340 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY No. 2:18-cv-2960 KJM DB INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiff, ORDER v. UNITED REVOLVER CLUB OF SACRAMENTO, INC., a California corporation,

Defendant. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19). On February 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.