Brown
(PC) Ramirez v. Brown
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK MARTINEZ RAMIREZ, No. 2:18-cv-01835-MCE-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER JERRY BROWN et al., Defendants. 16 On February 5, 2020, the Court dismissed this action without further leave to amend. (ECF Nos. 58, 59.) On February 10, 2020, Plaintiff, who had proceeded without counsel and in forma pauperis in the district court, filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 60.) Thereafter, on March 9, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this matter to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. (ECF No. 65.) “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma pauperis status appropriate where district…