Valinken

(HC) Lin v. Valinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20201:19-cv-01806California1,775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WEI LIN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01806-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR STAY OF REMOVAL

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

RICHARD VALINKEN, et al., (ECF No. 4) Respondents.

16 Petitioner Wei Lin is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner alleges violations of his right to due process in connection with his expedited removal proceedings and credible fear determination. (ECF No. 1). , Petitioner also moves for stay of removal. (ECF No. 4). The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 11, 13). On January 8, 2020, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response to both the petition and Petitioner’s motion for stay of removal within sixty days. (ECF No. 10). On February 28, 2020, Respondent filed a status report, informing the Court that although Petitioner was scheduled for removal in early February 2020, the Department of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.