Ramirez

Ramirez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20202:17-cv-02379California4,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELICA MATA RAMIREZ, No. 2:17-cv-02379-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 15 Defendants.

17 Through the present lawsuit, Plaintiff Angelica Mata Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) seeks damages from her former employer, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Defendant” or “Wells Fargo”) for using her name and identifying features on four mailers she alleges were sent to Wells Fargo customers after Plaintiff had resigned from her position as a Home Mortgage Consultant in August 2017. Plaintiff’s operative complaint includes a total of five causes of action seeking damages for statutory and common law invasion of privacy, intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair competition. Now before the Court is Wells Fargo’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or, alternatively, for summary adjudication as to the various specific claims pled by Plaintiff. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.