Sullivan

(HC) Andrus v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20201:19-cv-01540California937 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON A. ANDRUS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01540-JDP Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST J. SULLIVAN, OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Respondent. ECF No. 1 16 17 Petitioner Jason A. Andrus, a state prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Petitioner claims that the prison’s late service of a rules violation report caused petitioner to lose 121 days of credit. Id. at 7. Petitioner has not stated that he sought any state-level judicial review of his claims before filing the instant petition, and he has provided no proof of any such proceedings. We will order petitioner to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust his claims. Discussion This matter is before the court for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.