Oregel

(HC) Sherrod v. Oregel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20201:19-cv-01075California860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT DENNIS SHERROD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01075-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. PETITION E. OREGEL, (Doc. No. 16) Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Albert Dennis Sherrod, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 14, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 16.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that objections were due within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) The time for filing objections has passed and petitioner has failed to do so.1 27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.