Fisher

(HC) Gonzalez v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20201:19-cv-01731California769 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO JACOBO GONZALEZ, No. 1:19-cv-01731-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. PETITION FISHER, (Doc. No. 11) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Armando Jacobo Gonzalez, a state prisoner proceeding in this action without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 18, 2020, after issuing an order requiring petitioner to show cause in writing why the petition should not be dismissed as untimely filed (Doc. No. 9), to which no response was filed by petitioner, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending the petition be dismissed as untimely filed. (Doc. No. 11.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that objections were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.