Spearman

(PC) Washington v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20202:19-cv-00616California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWAIN WASHINGTON, No. 2:19-cv-0616-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M.E. SPEARMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 12, 2020, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, a viable Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Schumacher, but had not alleged any viable claims against defendant Spearman. ECF No. 7. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the claim against defendant Schumacher or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claim against defendant Schumacher. See ECF No. 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. ///// ///// 28 Further, IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.