Enjalran

(PS) Nelson Rogers v. Enjalran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20202:19-cv-01564California3,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY A. NELSON ROGERS, No. 2:19-cv-01564-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAUL J. ENJALRAN et al., (ECF Nos. 25, 28, 29, 30, 33) Defendants. 16 Presently before the court are four motions to dismiss by ten defendants. (ECF Nos. 25, 28, 29, 30.) Plaintiff has filed two nearly identical oppositions to defendants’ motions that do not provide substantive analysis. (ECF Nos. 31, 32.) Plaintiff also filed a motion to amend her pleading and a proposed Third Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 33, 34). A hearing on the motions to dismiss was held on March 11, 2020; plaintiff appeared representing herself, James Petrila appeared telephonically for the individual federal defendants and the United States, Ian McGlone appeared for defendant Roughton, Shannon Hewitt appeared for defendants Allred and K. Knight, and Jason Shane appeared for defendant Marriott. After hearing oral argument and

Plaintiff names the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.