Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20201:19-cv-01494California137 words

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MITY-LITE, INC., CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01494 AWI JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 15) 13 v. 14

EDSAL SANDUSKY CORPORATION,

15 Defendant. 16 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 15) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated: March 17, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 24

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25

26 27 28